Brief elevation of hepatic enzymes due to liver ischemia in anorexia nervosa.

Abnormal liver function is occasionally observed in patients affected by anorexia nervosa. Although numerous studies report a strong relation between malnutrition and liver damage, the pathogenesis remains still unclear. We describe a case of a young girl with severe anorexia nervosa who developed acute liver damage with multiorgan involvement during extremely poor nutritional status. In this patient severe malnutrition constituted a predisposing factor for multiorgan dysfunction. In the absence of other identifiable factors, we hypothesized that a marked increase in liver enzymes and other biochemical abnormalities could be a consequence of a precipitating cause as acute hypoperfusion, suggested by clinical symptoms (marked dehydration, hypotension, bradycardia, hypothermia) and laboratory data. Rapid normalization of liver function tests and other biochemical parameters with rehydration and gradual nutritional support confirmed this hypothesis.

Effect of the amino acid alanine on glucagon secretion in non-diabetic and type 1 diabetic subjects during hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemia, hypoglycaemia and post-hypoglycaemic hyperglycaemia.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of our study was to establish whether the well-known defective or absent secretion of glucagon in type 1 diabetes in response to hypoglycaemia is selective or includes lack of responses to other stimuli, such as amino acids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Responses of glucagon to hypoglycaemia were measured in eight patients with type 1 diabetes and six non-diabetic subjects during hyperinsulinaemic (insulin infusion 0.5 mU kg(-1) min(-1)) and eu-, hypo- and hyperglycaemic clamp studies (sequential steps of plasma glucose 5.0, 2.9, 5.0, 10 mmol/l). Subjects were studied on three randomised occasions with infusion of low- or high-dose alanine, or saline. RESULTS: With saline, glucagon increased in hypoglycaemia in non-diabetic subjects but not in diabetic subjects. Glucagon increased further with low-dose (181 +/- 16 ng l(-1) min(-1)) and high-dose alanine (238 +/- 20 ng l(-1) min(-1)) in non-diabetic subjects, but only with high-dose alanine in diabetic subjects (area under curve 112 +/- 5 ng l(-1) min(-1)). The alanine-induced glucagon increase in diabetic subjects paralleled the spontaneous glucagon response to hypoglycaemia in non-diabetic subjects not receiving alanine. The greater responses of glucagon to hypoglycaemia with alanine infusion were offset by recovery of eu- or hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In type 1 diabetes, the usually deficient responses of glucagon to hypoglycaemia may improve after increasing the concentration of plasma amino acids. Amino acid-enhanced secretion of glucagon in response to hypoglycaemia remains under physiological control since it is regulated primarily by the ambient plasma glucose concentration. These findings might be relevant to improving counter-regulatory defences against insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes.

Comparison of glycaemic control over 1 year with pioglitazone or gliclazide in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To compare long-term (1 year) efficacy and safety of pioglitazone and gliclazide in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This was a double-blind, multicentre, comparative, parallel group trial in 283 patients with Type 2 diabetes, who were randomized to receive 1-year treatment with pioglitazone 30-45 mg/day or gliclazide 80-320 mg/day. Drug dose was titrated on the basis of self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) measurements and HbA1c values. The 1-year changes in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin, HOMA-S (HOmeostatic Model Assessment) and SMBG were compared. In a subgroup of patients (n = 10), systemic glucose production and utilization were determined by a combination of isotopic (deuterated glucose) and clamp techniques. RESULTS: In both groups, there were similar decreases in HbA1c (pioglitazone: -0.79%; gliclazide: -0.79%) and FBG (pioglitazone: -1.0 mmol/l; gliclazide: -0.7 mmol/l), whereas the slope of the reduction of fasting blood glucose was different between groups (P = 0.004). Insulin levels as well as insulin resistance assessed using HOMA-S decreased significantly only after pioglitazone treatment (-11.94 pmol/l and -1.03, respectively, both P = 0.002 vs. baseline). A significantly greater reduction in systemic glucose production was observed in the pioglitazone group (-2.48 micromol/kg/min, P = 0.042) than in the gliclazide group (-1.02 micromol/kg/min). A few, mild adverse events occurred in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A comparable decrease in HbA1c and FBG was observed with pioglitazone and gliclazide. However, with pioglitazone there was a continuous decrease in FBG over 1 year, whereas gliclazide failed to maintain a similar trend. This favourable effect of pioglitazone was due to its insulin-sensitizing effect and ability to decrease systemic glucose production.

Factors affecting dropout in outpatient eating disorder treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and effects of factors potentially influencing eating disordered patients' dropping out of outpatient cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). METHOD: Sixty-seven (64 female, 3 male) patients with eating disorders participated in the study. All patients followed a multidisciplinary team approach for a median period of 9 months. Several factors potentially affecting dropout were retrospectively assessed prior to treatment. RESULTS: The dropout rate was significantly higher in patients with purging anorexia nervosa (AN) compared to those with restrictive AN, bulimia nervosa and eating disorder not otherwise specified (33% vs. 27%, 25% or 21%, respectively, p<0.05). Among several factors influencing dropout, there was a significant association of patient low cooperativeness, purging episodes, restrictive eating, use of several weight control practices and psychiatric co-morbidity in patients who dropped out compared to completers (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In outpatient eating disorder treatment, non-compliance and premature interruption of therapy are affected primarily by factors which are related to patients' attitude and behaviour. These factors should be carefully addressed in patients with eating disorders to improve outcome.

Insulin aspart improves meal time glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, stratified, double-blind and cross-over trial.

AIMS: This randomized, multi-centre, double-blind, stratified, two period, cross-over trial was undertaken to assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart injected immediately before compared with regular human insulin injected 30 min before a Mediterranean-style meal in 37 (23 M, 14 F) patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Insulin aspart or regular human insulin was given subcutaneously (0.15 U/kg) in random sequence, using a double-dummy technique (at one visit: human regular insulin at t=-30 min and placebo at t=0; at the other visit: placebo at t=-30 min and aspart insulin at t=0). Serum glucose and insulin concentrations (15 points) were measured after each meal for 240 min. RESULTS: Post-prandial glycaemic excursions were 20% lower with insulin aspart (IAsp) compared with regular human insulin (HI) treatment [ratio (Iasp/HI)=0.80, CI=(0.66-0.98), P=0.034]. The maximum serum glucose (SG) concentration was similar for the two treatments (P=NS). The (median) time to maximum SG was 25 min shorter for IAsp compared with HI (P=0.048). Maximum serum insulin concentration was higher after IAsp compared with HI (P=0.023) as well as the area under the 4-h serum insulin curve (P=0.006). Furthermore, the time to maximum serum insulin concentration was 27 min shorter after IAsp (P=0.039), even though IAsp was injected 30 min after HI. No adverse events occurred during the trial. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Type 2 diabetes a more favourable insulin profile and a better glycaemic control were found with IAsp injected immediately before compared with HI injected 30 min before a Mediterranean-style meal.

Better long-term glycaemic control with the basal insulin glargine as compared with NPH in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus given meal-time lispro insulin.

BACKGROUND: Glargine is a long-acting insulin analogue potentially more suitable than NPH insulin in intensive treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1 DM), but no study has proven superiority. The aim of this study was to test superiority of glargine on long-term blood glucose (BG) as well as on responses to hypoglycaemia vs. NPH. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients with T1 DM on intensive therapy on four times/day NPH and lispro insulin at each meal, were randomized to either continuation of NPH four times/day (n = 60), or once daily glargine at dinner-time (n = 61) for 1 year. Lispro insulin at meal-time was continued in both groups. In 11 patients from each group, responses to stepped hyperinsulinaemic-hypoglycaemia were measured before and after 1 year's treatment. RESULTS: Mean daily BG was lower with glargine [7.6 +/- 0.11 mmol/l (137 +/- 2 mg/dl)] vs. NPH [8.1 +/- 0.22 mmol/l (146 +/- 4 mg/dl)] (P < 0.05). HbA(1c) at 4 months did not change with NPH, but decreased with glargine (from 7.1 +/- 0.1 to 6.7 +/- 0.1%), and remained lower than NPH at 12 months (6.6 +/- 0.1%, P < 0.05 vs. NPH). Frequency of mild hypoglycaemia [self-assisted episodes, blood glucose < or = 4.0 mmol/l (72 mg/dl)] was lower with glargine vs. NPH (7.2 +/- 0.5 and 13.2 +/- 0.6 episodes/patient-month, P < 0.05). After 1 year, NPH treatment resulted in no change of responses to hypoglycaemia, whereas with glargine plasma glucose, thresholds and maximal responses of plasma adrenaline and symptoms to hypoglycaemia improved (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The simpler glargine regimen decreases the percentage of HbA(1c) and frequency of hypoglycaemia and improves responses to hypoglycaemia more than NPH. Thus, glargine appears more suitable than NPH as basal insulin for intensive treatment of T1 DM.

Rate of fall of blood glucose and physiological responses of counterregulatory hormones, clinical symptoms and cognitive function to hypoglycaemia in Type I diabetes mellitus in the postprandial state.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to establish the effect of a rate of decreasing plasma glucose concentrations on responses to hypoglycaemia, i.e. release of counterregulatory hormones, perception of symptoms, deterioration of cognitive function, and rates of forearm noradrenaline spillover, in the postprandial condition and in the sitting position. METHODS: We studied 11 subjects with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, twice during clamped insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (2.4 mmol/l) after eating in the sitting position. On one occasion, plasma glucose was decreased at the rate of 0.1+/-0.003 mmol x min(-1) x l(-1) (fast fall), on the other at the rate of 0.03+/-0.001 mmol x min(-1) x l(-1) (slow fall). Subjects underwent a control euglycaemic clamp study as well. RESULTS: In response to fast-fall as compared to slow-fall hypoglycaemia, which was about 30 min longer, cognitive tasks were performed as follows: Trail-Making B, PASAT 2 s, Digit Vigilance Test and Verbal Memory deteriorated more, adrenaline increased less (2.8+/-0.5 vs 3.5+/-0.7 nmol/l, p=0.03), forearm noradrenaline spillover was greater (6.5+/-1.0 vs 5.2+/-0.4 pmol x min(-1) x 100 ml(-1), p=0.04), and symptoms were no different. After recovery from hypoglycaemia, cognitive function was still deteriorated compared to the baseline with no difference between fast and slow-fall hypoglycaemia. The evident response of glucagon to postprandial hypoglycaemia contrasted with the blunted or absent response in the fasting state. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: In the postprandial condition and sitting position, fast-fall hypoglycaemia is more dangerous than slow-fall, because it deteriorates cognitive function more, and activates responses of counterregulatory hormones less than slow-fall hypoglycaemia.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro.

To compare the pharmacokinetics/dynamics of the long-acting insulin analog glargine with NPH, ultralente, and continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion of insulin lispro (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]), 20 C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic patients were studied on four occasions during an isoglycemic 24-h clamp. Patients received SC injection of either 0.3 U/kg glargine or NPH insulin (random sequence, crossover design). On two subsequent occasions, they received either an SC injection of ultralente (0.3 U/kg) or CSII (0.3 U x kg(-1) x 24 h(-1)) (random sequence, crossover design). After SC insulin injection or CSII, intravenous (IV) insulin was tapered, and glucose was infused to clamp plasma glucose at 130 mg/dl for 24 h. Onset of action (defined as reduction of IV insulin >50%) was earlier with NPH (0.8 +/- 0.2 h), CSII (0.5 +/- 0.1 h), and ultralente (1 +/- 0.2 h) versus glargine (1.5 +/- 0.3 h) (P < 0.05) (mean +/- SE). End of action (defined as an increase in plasma glucose >150 mg/dl) occurred later with glargine (22 +/- 4 h) than with NPH (14 +/- 3 h) (P < 0.05) but was similar with ultralente (20 +/- 6 h). NPH and ultralente exhibited a peak concentration and action (at 4.5 +/- 0.5 and 10.1 +/- 1 h, respectively) followed by waning, whereas glargine had no peak but had a flat concentration/action profile mimicking CSII. Interindividual variability (calculated as differences in SD of plasma insulin concentrations and glucose infusion rates in different treatments) was lower with glargine than with NPH and ultralente (P < 0.05) but was similar with glargine and CSII (NS). In conclusion, NPH and ultralente are both peak insulins. Duration of action of ultralente is greater, but intersubject variability is also greater than that of NPH. Glargine is a peakless insulin, it lasts nearly 24 h, it has lower intersubject variability than NPH and ultralente, and it closely mimics CSII, the gold standard of basal insulin replacement.

Contribution of postprandial versus interprandial blood glucose to HbA1c in type 1 diabetes on physiologic intensive therapy with lispro insulin at mealtime.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitate the contribution of postprandial blood glucose, which improves with the short-acting insulin analog lispro [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] in type 1 diabetes, to the overall 24-h blood glucose concentration and the long-term HbA1c concentration under conditions of different postabsorptive blood glucose. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 24 type 1 diabetic patients on long-term intensive therapy with premeal human regular insulin (Hum-R) and bedtime NPH were randomly assigned to a continuation of Hum-R (group 1, n = 8), lispro (group 2, n = 8), or lispro + NPH (in variable proportions) administered at mealtime (group 3, n = 8) for 3 months, NPH administered at bedtime was continued in all three groups. Data from home blood glucose monitoring were collected, and a 24-h plasma glucose and insulin profile was obtained during a 2-day hospital visit to calculate areas under the postprandial glucose curve (3.5 h after breakfast, 3.5 h after lunch, and 3.0 h after dinner for a total of 10.0 h) and the postabsorptive blood glucose curve (the remaining 14.0 h out of 24.0 h) (AUC). Eight nondiabetic subjects were also studied. RESULTS: The substitution of Hum-R with lispro (group 2) resulted in lower postprandial blood glucose, but greater postabsorptive blood glucose (P < 0.05 vs. group 1). The postprandial blood glucose AUC was lower (161 +/- 19 vs. 167 +/- 20 mg.100 ml-1.h-1), but the postabsorptive blood glucose AUC was greater (155 +/- 22 vs. 142 +/- 19 mg.100 ml-1.h-1) (P < 0.05). Therefore, the 24-h blood glucose AUC was no different (NS). Consequently, HbA1c was no different (NS). This occurred because in group 2, mealtime lispro resulted in normal prandial plasma insulin, but also resulted in lower interprandial concentration (P < 0.05 vs. group 1). When NPH was added to lispro (30% at breakfast, 40% at lunch, 10% at dinner) in group 3, postabsorptive plasma insulin was similar to group 1 (NS), in group 3, the postprandial blood glucose AUC (153 +/- 17 mg.100 ml-1.h-1) was lower and the postabsorptive blood glucose AUC was no different, as compared with group 1 (NS). Therefore, the 24-h blood glucose AUC was lower (147 +/- 17 vs. 155 +/- 21 and 158 +/- 20 mg.100 ml-1.h-1), and HbA1c was lower (6.41 +/- 0.12 vs. 6.84 +/- 0.2 and 6.96 +/- 0.2% (groups 3, 1, and 2 respectively, P < 0.05). Frequency of hypoglycemia was greater in group 2 (P < 0.05), but not in group 3 (NS) vs. group 1.

Long-term intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes with the short-acting insulin analog lispro in variable combination with NPH insulin at mealtime.

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether the short-acting insulin analog lispro can be successfully implemented in long-term intensive insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes, and if so, what its effects are on glycemic control and frequency and awareness of hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We randomized 56 type 1 diabetic patients to treatment with either lispro (n = 28) or human regular insulin (Hum-R; n = 28) as mealtime insulin for 1 year (open design, parallel groups). Lispro was injected at mealtime and Hum-R was given 10-40 min before meals (bedtime NPH was continued on both occasions). With lispro, NPH was added at breakfast (approximately 70/30), lunch (approximately 60/40), and supper (approximately 80/20) (mixing percentage of lispro/NPH) to optimize premeal and bedtime blood glucose. RESULTS: Total daily insulin units were no different in the two treatment groups, but with lispro approximately 30% less short-acting insulin at meals and approximately 30% more NPH was needed versus Hum-R (P < 0.05). The bedtime NPH dosage was no different. With lispro + NPH, the mean daily blood glucose was lower than with Hum-R (8.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.1 mmol/l; P < 0.05), HbA1c was lower (6.34 +/- 0.10 vs. 6.71 +/- 0.11%, mean value over 1 year; P < 0.002), and hypoglycemia (blood glucose < or = 3.8 mmol/l) was less frequent (7.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 11.5 +/- 0.7 episodes/patient-month) and tended to occur more within 90 min after meals than in the postabsorptive state (P < 0.05 vs. Hum-R). After 1 year, plasma adrenaline and symptom responses to experimental, stepped hypoglycemia improved with lispro and were closer to the responses of 12 nondiabetic control subjects versus Hum-R both in terms of thresholds and magnitude (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that mealtime injection of lispro + NPH improves the 24-h blood glucose and the percentage HbA1c as compared with Hum-R. The improvement can be maintained long term. Intensive therapy with lispro + NPH results in less frequent hypoglycemia and better awareness and counterregulation of hypoglycemia.

Use of the short-acting insulin analogue lispro in intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus: importance of appropriate replacement of basal insulin and time-interval injection-meal.

To establish whether lispro may be a suitable short-acting insulin preparation for meals in intensive treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients already in chronic good glycaemic control with conventional insulins, 69 patients on intensive therapy (4 daily s.c. insulin injections, soluble at each meal, NPH at bedtime, HbA1c <7.5%) were studied with an open, cross-over design for two periods of 3 months each (lispro or soluble). The % HbA1c and frequency of hypoglycaemia were assessed under four different conditions (Groups I-IV). Lispro was always injected at mealtime, soluble 10-40 min prior to meals (with the exception of Group IV). Bedtime NPH was continued with both treatments. When lispro replaced soluble with no increase in number of daily NPH injections (Group I, n = 15), HbA1c was no different (p = NS), but frequency of hypoglycaemia was greater (p < 0.05). When NPH was given 3-4 times daily, lispro (Group II, n = 18), but not soluble (Group III, n = 12) decreased HbA1c by 0.35 +/- 0.25% with no increase in hypoglycaemia. When soluble was injected at mealtimes, HbA1c increased by 0.18 +/- 0.15% and hypoglycaemia was more frequent than when soluble was injected 10-40 min prior to meals (Group IV, n = 24) (p < 0.05). It is concluded that in intensive management of Type 1 DM, lispro is superior to soluble in terms of reduction of % HbA1c and frequency of hypoglycaemia, especially for those patients who do not use a time interval between insulin injection and meal. However, these goals cannot be achieved without optimization of basal insulin.

Long-term intensive therapy of IDDM patients with clinically overt autonomic neuropathy: effects on hypoglycemia awareness and counterregulation.

To test the hypothesis that hypoglycemia unawareness and impaired counterregulation are reversible after meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia in IDDM patients with diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN), 21 patients (8 without DAN [DAN-]; 13 with DAN [DAN+]; of the latter, 7 had orthostatic hypotension [DAN+PH+] and 6 did not [DAN+PH-]) and 15 nondiabetic subjects were studied during stepped hypoglycemia (plateau plasma glucose decrements from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/l) before and 6 months after prevention of hypoglycemia (intensive therapy). After 6 months, frequency of mild hypoglycemia decreased from approximately 20 to approximately 2 episodes/patient-month while HbA1c increased from 6.2 +/- 0.3 to 6.9 +/- 0.2% (P < 0.05). Responses of adrenaline improved more in DAN- patients (from 1.17 +/- 0.12 to 2.4 +/- 0.22 nmol/l) than in DAN+PH- (from 0.75 +/- 0.25 to 1.56 +/- 0.23 nmol/l) and DAN+PH+ patients (from 0.80 +/- 0.24 to 1.15 +/- 0.27 nmol/l, P < 0.05) but remained lower than in nondiabetic subjects (4.9 +/- 0.37 nmol/l, P < 0.05), whereas glycemic thresholds normalized only in DAN-, not DAN+. Autonomic symptoms of hypoglycemia improved but remained lower in DAN- (6.2 +/- 0.6) than in nondiabetic subjects (8.1 +/- 1.1) and lower in DAN+PH+ (4 +/- 0.8) than in DAN+PH- subjects (5.1 +/- 0.8, P < 0.05), whereas neuroglycopenic symptoms normalized (NS). Cognitive function deteriorated less before than after prevention of hypoglycemia (P < 0.05). Thus, intensive therapy with emphasis on preventing hypoglycemia reverses hypoglycemia unawareness in DAN+ patients despite marginal improvement of adrenaline responses, results in low frequency of hypoglycemia despite impaired counterregulation, and maintains HbA1c in the range of intensive therapy. We conclude that DAN, long IDDM duration per se, and antecedent recent hypoglycemia contribute to different extents to impaired adrenaline responses and hypoglycemia unawareness.

Evidence of increased systemic glucose production and gluconeogenesis in an early stage of NIDDM.

To assess the mechanisms of fasting hyperglycemia in NIDDM patients with mild elevation of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) compared with NIDDM patients with overt hyperglycemia, we studied 29 patients with NIDDM, who were divided in two groups according to their fasting plasma glucose (<7.8 and > or =7.8 mmol/l for groups A and B, respectively), and 16 control subjects who were matched with NIDDM patients for age, sex, and body mass index. All subjects were infused with [3-3H]glucose between 10:00 P.M. and 10:00 A.M. during overnight fasting to determine glucose fluxes. In 27 subjects (17 diabetic and 10 control), [U-14C]alanine was simultaneously infused between 4:00 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. to measure gluconeogenesis (GNG) from alanine. Arterialized-venous plasma samples were collected every 30 min for measurement of glucose fluxes, GNG, and glucoregulatory hormones. In group A, plasma glucose, rate of systemic glucose production (SGP), and GNG were greater than in control subjects (7.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, 10.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 9.5 +/- 0.3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), and 0.58 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.37 +/- 0.02 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively, for group A and control subjects; mean value 8:00 A.M.-10:00 A.M., all P < 0.05). Both increased SGP and GNG correlated with plasma glucose in all subjects (r = 0.77 and r = 0.75, respectively, P < 0.005). Plasma counterregulatory hormones did not differ in NIDDM patients compared to control subjects. The present studies demonstrate that SGP and GNG are increased in NIDDM patients without overt fasting hyperglycemia. Thus these metabolic abnormalities primarily contribute to early development of overnight and fasting hyperglycemia in NIDDM.

Contribution of autonomic neuropathy to reduced plasma adrenaline responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM: evidence for a nonselective defect.

To determine the contribution of clinically overt diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) to reduced plasma adrenaline responses to hypoglycemia in IDDM and to establish its selectivity for hypoglycemia, we studied 17 IDDM patients (7 without DAN [DAN-] and 10 with DAN [DAN+]), of whom 5 had and 5 did not have postural hypotension (DAN+PH+ and DAN+PH-, respectively), and 8 nondiabetic subjects on 2 different occasions, i.e., clamped hypoglycemia (steps from 5.0 to 2.2 mmol/l plasma glucose) and 30-min steady-state exercise at 55% V(O[2max]). Recent antecedent hypoglycemia was meticulously prevented before the studies to exclude hypoglycemia as a cause of reduced responses of adrenaline to hypoglycemia. In DAN- patients, maximal responses of adrenaline to hypoglycemia were reduced (2.44 +/- 0.58 nmol/l vs. 4.9 +/- 0.54 nmol/l in nondiabetic patients) (P < 0.05). In DAN+, adrenaline responses initiated at a lower plasma glucose and were lower than in DAN- (DAN+PH-, 1.06 +/- 0.38 nmol/l; DAN+PH+, 0.84 +/- 0.27 nmol/l; P < 0.001, but NS between PH- and PH+). In response to exercise, adrenaline increased less in DAN- (0.89 +/- 0.11 nmol/l) patients than in nondiabetic subjects (1.19 +/- 0.14 nmol/l; NS) and only to 0.36 +/- 0.07 nmol/l in DAN+PH- and 0.23 +/- 0.09 nmol/l in DAN+PH+ (P < 0.001 vs. DAN- and nondiabetic subjects). These results were confirmed when nondiabetic and DAN- subjects repeated the exercise at 60 watts (35 and 41% of V(O[2max]), respectively), i.e., at the same absolute workload of DAN+ patients. Thus, DAN (both PH+ and PH-) contributes to reduced responses of adrenaline to hypoglycemia independently of recent antecedent hypoglycemia. The adrenaline defect in DAN is not selective for hypoglycemia.

Late post-prandial hypoglycaemia as the sole presenting feature of secreting pancreatic beta-cell adenoma in a subtotally gastrectomized patient.

In this paper we describe for the first time late post-prandial hypoglycaemia as the sole presenting feature of an insulinoma in a patient who had previously undergone subtotal gastrectomy. The symptoms of hypoglycaemia always occurred 1-3 h after meals, not in the fasting state. Because of the history of gastrectomy and because post-prandial hypoglycaemia was reproduced by an oral glucose tolerance test, the diagnosis of reactive hypoglycaemia was made. Eighteen months later a fasting test was performed: venous plasma glucose decreased from 3.8 mmol/l to 2.7 mmol/l between 14 and 20 h of fast while plasma immunoreactive insulin did not decrease and plateaued at 185 pmol/l. Plasma C-peptide (0.9 nmol/l) and proinsulin (70 pmol/l, split 64, 65) were also elevated. All islet hormones increased in response to i.v. glucose and were suppressed after diazoxide. Although pre-operative procedures were negative in localizing an insulinoma, the patient underwent an operation and an insulinoma was detected at the body level of the pancreas. Thus, insulinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of reactive hypoglycaemia in gastrectomized patients. Response of islet hormones to glucose and their suppression by diazoxide are evidence of a secreting insulinoma even in the absence of preoperative localization of the pancreatic adenoma.

Effects of the short-acting insulin analog [Lys(B28),Pro(B29)] on postprandial blood glucose control in IDDM.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the effects of the short-acting insulin analog Lispro versus human regular insulin (Hum-R) on postprandial metabolic control in IDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Four studies were performed in 10 C-peptide-negative IDDM patients. Lispro or Hum-R (0.15 U/kg) or Lispro + NPH (0.07 U/kg) or Hum-R + NPH were injected subcutaneously 30 min (Hum-R) or 5 min (Lispro) before lunch. Preprandial plasma glucose (PG) was maintained on all four occasions at approximately 7.3 mmol/l by intravenous insulin. RESULTS: After subcutaneous Lispro injection, plasma free insulin (FIRI) was greater between 0 and 2 h (233 +/- 22 pmol/l) than after Hum-R (197 +/- 25 pmol/l) but lower between 2.25 and 7 h (81 +/- 10 vs. 104 +/- 13 pmol/l, P < 0.05). After Lispro, PG was lower versus Hum-R for 3 h (7.4 +/- 0.6 vs. 8.3 +/- 0.9 mmol/l) but subsequently increased more than after Hum-R (3.25-7h, 11.3 +/- 1 vs. 9.6 +/- 1.2 mmol/l), resulting in a 7-h postprandial PG greater than Hum-R (9.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l) (all P < 0.05). Addition of NPH to Lispro increased the 2.5-to 7-h FIRI to 110 +/- 11 pmol/l and decreased the 3.25- to 7-h PG to 7.7 +/- 0.8 pmol/l, resulting in 0- to 7-h PG (7.3 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) lower than after Hum-R + NPH (7.9 +/- 0.5 pmol/l) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At meals, in order for Lispro to improve postprandial blood glucose not only at 2-h, but also over a 7-h period in C-peptide-negative IDDM, basal insulin must be optimally replaced.